Skip to content

Waiver Of Immunity Loan Agreement

by admin on December 20th, 2020

In addition to the risks associated with cross-border credit transactions, transactions involving a state or its public bodies as borrowers generally carry the risk that the lender will not be able to obtain justice in the borrower`s local courts in the event of default. As a result, lenders have the option of suing the borrower in other states (where the borrower has assets). To do so, lenders will generally require the borrower to lift his or her immunity from prosecution in the courts of another state. With regard to transnational financing transactions, it is not uncommon for sovereign immunity clauses to be lifted in a similar manner. Indeed, the waiver of sovereign immunity clauses implies an explicit lifting of the borrower`s immunity “from the seizure before the sentencing and seizure for the execution of one of his property and property, regardless of their use or use.” In agreements such as the exim loan agreement, it is also customary for the state to grant a state guarantee or state compensation as a kind of consolation in favour of the lender. Soft and elementary terms, “sovereignty” is the highest authority within a territory. It is the power of a state or a government to govern itself without outside interference. On the other hand, “sovereign immunity” is a legal doctrine that grants one state or nation immunity from civil or criminal prosecution in the courts of another state. The lifting of the state immunity clause contained in the exim loan agreement is a standard clause in trade policy documents involving sovereigns and there is nothing unusual about its inclusion in the agreement. The language of the agreement was clear and both sides agreed. Several public borrowers have agreements with similar provisions. Given that government borrowers are often insolvent and the borrower`s legal system would likely be inhospitable to a foreign lender, the lender would generally prefer to have an independent forum to adjudicate all disputes arising from the agreement, as well as for the purposes of enforcement of judgments or arbitration awards. As a result, the lifting of sovereign immunity clauses is rarely omitted in the negotiation and documentation of transnational credit agreements involving a state borrower.

As explained above, the rule of sovereign immunity protects the state from being prosecuted in another state (judicial immunity) and its assets in other states cannot be confiscated to enforce a court decision or arbitral award (immunity of execution). That`s the rule of absolute immunity. The doctrine of restrictive immunity has been transformed into law by the United States (in the Foreign States Immunity Act – FSIA), the United Kingdom (im State Immunity Act – SIA) and several other jurisdictions. Given the impact of this doctrine on sovereign trade agreements, the FSIA and the ASA appear to be the most notable developments in the development of the Sovereign Immunity Act. According to media reports, that the lifting of the sovereign immunity clause in the exim loan agreement provides that: in the media (both in the print media and on social media platforms), there has been unrest about the Nigerian government ceding its sovereignty under the sovereign immunity waiver clause contained in the $400 million loan contract (contract of loan) that he signed with China in 2018. , with regard to the backbone of the National Information and Communication Infrastructure (ICT) Phase II.

From → Uncategorized

Comments are closed.